Trial0

Clinical trial · NCT06058611

Effects of a Computerised Cognitive Stimulation Versus Stimulating Leisure Activities

Recruiting

Sponsor: Universidad de Zaragoza

We save this real registry record and notify you if its published status changes. Create an account to add profile details that improve future matching.

Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate, at the level of global cognition, cognitive neuroconstructs, memory, verbal fluency, ADLs, IADLs, symptoms of depression and anxiety, the effectiveness of a personalised and adapted computerised cognitive stimulation programme (GI1) implemented from Primary Care versus stimulating leisure activities (GI2), in older adults aged 50 years and over with mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive impairment living in the community.

Interventions

  • Cognitive stimulation · OTHER

    Cognitive stimulation through the stimulus platform; 30 minutes/day, 5 days/week, 8 weeks; 40 sessions. The following will be worked on: memory, orientation, language, praxis, gnosis, calculation, perception, logical reasoning, attention-concentration and executive functions.

  • Stimulating leisure activities · OTHER

    Intervention group 2 (IG2) will perform between 2 and 5 cognitively stimulating leisure activities for 8 weeks. These leisure activities will be selected from the adapted version of the Karp et al. 2006 questionnaire (Karp et al., 2006) taking into account the three components of leisure activities (mental, physical and social). The questionnaire contains 29 activities. In addition to indicating which cognitively stimulating leisure activities they perform on a weekly basis, participants in IG2 will indicate their daily frequency (\< 30 min, 30min-1 hour, 1-2 hours, \> 2 hours), commenting on whether they have carried them out individually or in a group. It will also be taken into account whether these activities were previously carried out according to their stage of life.

Published eligibility criteria

Verbatim from the registry. Only the site can decide how these apply to a specific patient.

Inclusion Criteria:

* ≥ 50 years old, resident in the community.
* Diagnosis of MCI or having between 24 and 27 points on the MEC-35 (this score seems to indicate the presence of MCI) (Calero, M. D and Navarro, 2006).
* Subjective cognitive impairment (score between 28-31 points on the MEC-35) (Gómez-Soria et al. 2023)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Institutionalisation.
* Taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors as they may act on global cognition and/or cognitive functions.
* Sensory deficits (deafness and blindness) preventing intervention.
* Agitation.
* Having received cognitive stimulation in the last 12 months.

Sites (1)

  • Centro de Salud Arrabal, Zaragoza, Zaragoza · Recruiting

Not medical advice. Trial0 is a navigation service, not a medical provider. Nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to pursue any treatment; eligibility matching is informational, based on published registry criteria, and only the trial site or treating clinician can determine actual eligibility. Decisions belong with the patient and their own doctors. Registry data refreshed at most hourly; last update posted 2024-12-12.

Effects of a Computerised Cognitive Stimulation Versus Stimulating Leisure Activities (NCT06058611) — Trial0